BRYTER Reviews & Product Details

Efficiently transferring legal knowledge into digital tools

So far, I have not experienced any major downsides, and that is what makes me enjoy the tool very much

Automating legal workflows

Bryter has helped us automate what we used to do manually. The charm was that we could use it without needing a software developer.

Hard to find anything since we were highly satisfied. We realized that customer support became stronger in the past than it used to be, so keep up investing in this valuable resource.

Bryter helped us automating some of our core processes.

Bryter is a great platform for workflow automation with a friendly user interface.

I have nothing in particular to dislike.

Bryter is a great way to automate contracts, processes and risk assessments. Its no-code approach to automation allows it to be used directly by business users.

The simplicity while using the tool and that it is a browser-based solution.

That complex solution are harder to implement

Automatic decission taking

BRYTER is an excellent instrument for organizations that are in need - and might not realize to be in need! - to automate their internal processes, but have no programming experts. Through BRYTER, we were able to reduce repetitive tasks significantly, making final results more consistent and our organisation generally more efficient. After a brief introduction, anybody can learn how to quickly build modules and "apps", without knowing anything about coding. And whenever a problem arises, the BRYTER team is ready to catch you and solve it very quickly.

There is not anything I dislike about BRYTER. The only problems that sometimes arise - as with any IT solution - are bugs, but they are always resolved very quickly.

We use BRYTER mainly for administrative and reporting purposes: we have built tools to allow the registration of new clients for example, and for lawyers to update the legal coordinator on their work. As everything flows automatically in our database, it has saved us time and made outcomes more predictable and consistent. Additionally, as we are a vounteer based organisation whose team members often change, BRYTER has allowed us to offer guided pathways to new members, who can feel confident they are following the right procedure.

Usability and Gamification approach. Very easy and fun to sue. At the same time mighty in its applications. There is a special benefit in letting lawyers do the programming. No communication needed between developers and experts. Great and smart approach.

No one found yet. It does what it should do.

We are using BRYTER to train law students at our university. It makes Legal Tech real. Great for teambuilding and integrating interactive formats into legal education.

Very fast results in the development of new modules - Constant expansion of the functional scope - Exemplary support

einzelne Einschränkungen, im wesentlichen verursacht durch die low-code philosophy

Dialogue-driven queries used to produce databases and documents and internal organisational support

easy handling, lots of options to configure

some options are limited, eg links in databases

- providing adequate legal templates customized for the use case - making processes more convenient

It's easy to use and you can digitalize a lot of different processes with it.

It takes a long time to build a tool by programming when you are not used to it.

We designed efficient Tools for our processes and therefore saved time and money. The only problem was that it took a lot of time because we have not been used to it in the beginning.

I like that it's intuitive to use and that I barely have to check the FAQs. If I have to look something up, there are helpful videos and articles, but best of all: there is always someone from Bryter to help, answer questions, and support. The module building itself is quick and leads to time-saving tools, which make the work not only easier for us lawyers, but also for my colleagues from other departments.

If there were things I didn't like or wanted to be implemented, Bryter helped, coded, and implemented them - nothing to dislike.

It saves so much time for recurring tasks and makes many functions available for the departments 24/7 without the need to ask a lawyer first.

Easy to use tool with some support and guidance.

There is a learning curve to using the platform, but Bryter provides good guidance and training.

Improving information collection and quality and ease of access.

Build your report based on the results .

All is well. It would have been better if we could connect an external database like SQL.

I didn't face any issue right now using BRYTER.

The accessibility and all support you get from Bryter Team all the time.

They have to improve a little bit more sincronisation between database and Bryter module.

The NDA´s and a lot of internal documents were generated with the help of Bryter.

The aspects I like most about Bryter are its simplicity and intuitive design. It is incredibly user-friendly and has kept on inspiring me to build, although I have no previous experience whatsoever in the tech area.

Sometimes it takes a little time to figure out the function most helpful for the aspect I want to translate into the module. However, I believe that the search is an essential part of the process and that it often is the complexity of the content adding to the time it takes to map out the translation with Bryter's available functions.

We use Bryter to facilitate the process of solving legal cases. Our module serves as a guide through the essential questions and problems that may arise. It gives sufficient background information to enable the user to work more efficiently without extensive background knowledge on the specific subject.

It is very easy to use. After learning the basics, you are quickly able to build different tools you have in mind.

So far I haven't discovered any points I dislike, as I haven't had the chance to use it extensively

Relatively simple disputes that need a written decision. This decision could be generated through BRYTER for a large part, which would save work.

BRYTER's workflow and logic creation is structured in such a way that makes it legible, easy to create branched logic, and highly configurable. If a user needs to use an expression to add functionality to their workflow, they will be familiar with the structure of the expressions, having seen similar examples throughout business applications like Excel.

When starting out, you should have a clear idea of what the structure of the workflow should be. If you haven't mapped out all the different possibilities or end-points, it can be tricky to go back and add additional branches. Once you're familiar with BRYTER however, this becomes second nature.

One of the primary uses for us has been to use BRYTER to add additional workflow and document review capabilities into a SharePoint-based solution. BRYTER has allowed us to ensure consistency in the solution's document review and provide data integrity.

Bryter offers and intuitive, scalable, and well-built software in combination with great support from their team.

Some features are still in development, such as an integration via API.

We automated document generation, decision making and request intakes through BRYTER.

Versatile options, customizable for your needs

it takes some time to understand the program as a non-programmer

Problem: Sending unstructured documents and missing information from clients, Benefits: Targeted retrieval of information and documents

There is so much possible with Bryter that you did not expect would be. It is a really nice program that gives you new insights in digital solutions. The people of Bryter are always happy to help and take as much time as needed to help you. If there is something that (you think) is not possible, they will always help you find a solution or even let the developers implement it.

It takes quite some time to really understand how to build a whole module step by step. And I think the formatting options could be a bit more extensive.

Creating a contract generator, to digitalize making loads of contracts manually.

Great customer support. Content agnostic tool. Multiple possible applications - can be used for different purposes and across multiple in-house departments.

A minor downside was the learning curve being steeper than initially expected (but this also depends on the complexity of the documents one aims to automate), meaning more time was spent learning how to use it.

Automated generation of standardized legal documents. Strong reduction of time and energy spent on drafting such documents on manual basis and has allowed us to better service our internal clients by being able to focus on higher value matters.