Collaborator Reviews & Product Details

It enables concurrent reviews in real time and supports global teams.

Performance for a large review team and large documents is not ideal.

Reduce review time by eliminating manual review process and review result compilation. Enable review participants to complete the review anywhere. Reduce review time by sharing review results at real time - reduce time-wasted on documenting duplicate findings.

Great side-by-side diff view. It's great for easily tracking defects on a file, and seeing all versions of the file that have been uploaded.

The UI is a little dated. Ironically, it looked better in older versions, but their most recent UI overhaul made things look very grey, bland, and boring.

Code reviews before every single submit. This is immeasurably valuable.

It's a great tool for code development and testing. We can easily review our other team members' code on a transparent platform. The best feature for me is that it replaces the yes/no GitHub pull request by an iterative workflow which really enhanced our capability to catch bugs quickly. It is also quite customizable.

Integrating Collaborator with the SCM took a lot of time. They do provide a manual for the same, but it is not very explanatory.

We are making a comprehensive web application for an e-commerce platform. Collaborator helped us in the code review process and tracking issues.

I like how easy it is to submit and review other employees code before going live

Bit of a learning curve at first, but easy to use afterwards!

Redundant and unusable code

E-marks, review trails, peer audits and bugs following are a portion of the components that have helped us in monitoring the survey procedure and guaranteeing the quality for code advancement. The capacity for encourages fulfills my interest and meddling nature. Easy mix with dev devices and QA is an immense in addition to. This has speeded up our procedure while as yet keeping up the QC.

Its bit untidy to keep up without a CDN as well, with its daemons. Also, its somewhat pricy - yet quality and components astute, it is one of the best source administration apparatuses in the business sector. The rest things were fine and is useful with the exception of the absence of instructional exercises which here and there lead to time wastage for determining an extremely basic issue.

the greatest advantage what Collaborator brought me out is this item permits me handle different kind of ventures notwithstanding their many-sided quality and introduction (advancement/relocation/non standard administration demands/basic undertakings and so forth) that make this application one of the best venture administration device available. It has filled the hole for variant control, code reviewing, and unit testing.

I liked the integration with multiple SCMs like Git, Perforce, Subversion. Also review creation and participation can be made easy using plugins found in the community, regardless of IDE, or the types of files one want to review.

I found many turn off features in Collaborator which makes it an awful software in my opinion. It takes an hour to upload a changelist of a few hundred small text files. The UI is pathetic. The color scheme is distracting. There is no syntax highlighting. I found many other problems with the software.

Using Collaborator for my dev-team to help us coordinate and do code reviews. Absolutely no benefits. I'll switch to more capable software.

It's very simple to share files and code scripts with colleagues to get help with problems.

Nothing, this software is great and I think need little improvement.

Taking projects to the team and asking for suggestions and ideas.

The review area for source controlled files was easy to add comments to different sections of the code. I also liked the way it showed the diffrences.

The main web interface is pretty dated looking and needs to be freshen up to look more modern.

We are using it to review our github source code for pull requests.

This product allows the software to adapt to its user. Each collaborater can tailor the tools to his work.

The software is easy to use, but there could be more options for customizing to certain industries

It really joins the team together and allows everyone to be in the loop regarding a specific task/project.

Code collaborator makes it easy to diff code to find what has been changed, and it is easy to comment on these code changes.

Uploading changed source code files must be done in a specific order for the tool to show code differences correctly.

Code collaborator allows us to peer review code changes so that errors can be detected early on in the development process. Catching bugs or errors in code during review has saved time that would be required in debugging once the issue surfaced through testing.

Collaborator is easy to setup and use. The user interface is also pretty good other good part is that it supports versioning tool like SVN (Subversion), CVS, Source Safe and more.

It could be made more easy to use, some new features could also be added

It helps with the most difficult work for any software developer, debugging. So if you can remove the most frustrating work, your productivity could be out of the room.

Being able to review office documents, marking which point of the document each comment refers to, and with a nice visual diff.

Compared to say github, it's slow and doesn't allow fluid communication. Comments can't be formatted with markdown AFAIK. The client is buggy.

Improve source code quality via peer review. Collaboration and review of technical publications.